Time & motion
Calendar, orbital cycles, libration and eclipse tools.
Change a dateComputational astronomy & interactive research
A living atlas of
the Earth–Moon system.
An independent platform connecting celestial calculations, lunar cartography, research, and developer tools through interfaces you can explore.
01 / A connected platform
The calendar is one entrance, not the extent of the work. The platform moves between time, place, explanation, and reuse.
Calendar, orbital cycles, libration and eclipse tools.
Change a dateOptical cartography, named features and coordinate-based inspection.
Inspect the atlasResearch literature, computational documentation and the limits of each model.
Explore the researchCalculation modules, public API documentation, embeds and machine-facing tools.
Follow a calculationThe design challenge
A phase, a place on the Moon, and an orbital cycle describe different things. The interface needs to connect them without making them interchangeable.
I designed multiple levels of entry: a readable first observation, an instrument to test it, and a method to inspect when you want to go further.
02 / Time becomes tangible
The Moon, calendar, numerical reading, and clock share one selected date. An interaction exposes the relationship more clearly than a still image can.
The orbital clock
A month depends on what you measure against: the Sun, the stars, the orbital nodes, or the Moon’s closest approach. Select a cycle to follow its rhythm.
A working excerpt of the product’s clock. Local source, not a screenshot or remote embed.
Product clock model · mean cycles, not orbital paths or an eclipse prediction. Radii are schematic; the globe uses fixed study lighting.
Calculated here · 12:00 UTC
Full Moon
The date also updates the clock above and the calculation trace below. North-up illustration with computed libration; not your local sky orientation.
01 One date drives several representations. The calendar’s phase symbols lead into a more detailed reading.
02 The renderer uses the product’s calculation modules, with a fixed noon-UTC sample and a clearly named observer.
Ernie Wright / NASA Scientific Visualization Studio, CGI Moon Kit · SVS 4720 ↗. LROC WAC color mosaic, NASA / GSFC and Arizona State University. Public domain.
Mapped onto a sphere with illustrative lighting; not a photograph of the selected day or a terrain-height model. All imagery and calculations in these exhibits are served locally.
Versioned source files, adaptations and texture hash ↗03 / From time to terrain
Select a named feature, center it, and add the coordinate grid. A surface becomes useful when you can connect what you see to where it is.
Selected surface feature / Crater
9.62° N · 20.08° W
A terraced impact crater within Oceanus Procellarum, with a conspicuous ray system.
Catalogue diameter 93 km
Six entries from the product catalogue, not a complete IAU database. Markers are symbolic, not feature outlines. Fixed study light; no elevation, temperature or gravity raster.
The same product renderer, in a different mode. Location, catalogue selection and optical imagery meet in one inspectable view. Image source ↑
Explore the full atlas04 / Under the interface
The calculation is not trapped inside the picture. Select a value to see how the platform turns a method into an interface—and data another tool can use.
01 / Calculation
Illumination(Body.Moon, time)Astronomy Engine 2.1.19, through the platform’s ephemeris module.
02 / Interface
A fraction becomes a readable percentage and controls the rendered terminator.
03 / Reusable data
{
"timestamp": "2026-09-26T12:00:00.000Z",
"illuminationFraction": 0.999,
"isWaxing": true
}Local result excerpt; not a request to the public API.
A system decision
The clock compares mean cycles; the selected-day view calculates an ephemeris. Naming that distinction avoids making a beautiful diagram look more precise than its model.
An editorial decision
Calculated readings, research material, and reflective almanac notes have different evidential roles. The product gives them separate labels and places, rather than blending them into a single claim.
Read the methodology05 / Project record
The interactive exhibits are bounded, locally hosted source excerpts. The earlier captures remain available as a historical record—not the main way to experience the work.
These exhibits use versioned copies of Lunologium’s clock model, ephemeris module, projection geometry, and WebGL renderer. Controls and composition are adapted for this case study. They do not depend on the live site staying online.
The 2026 date range samples each day at 12:00 UTC. The ephemeris fixes the observer at Greenwich (51.4769° N, 0.0005° W, elevation 46 m). Distance is observer-relative; the Moon illustration is lunar-north-up, not a view from that local horizon. Mean clock cycles are not eclipse predictions.
The atlas exposes six product catalogue entries and the optical mosaic. It does not present conceptual temperature or gravity illustrations as measured rasters. Role credit follows the existing portfolio record; no independent user, accuracy, or business-outcome claims are added.
Versioned instrument record ↗An inviting surface. A substantial system underneath.